Love, Writing, Mac Barnett, and Privilege by Dean Gloster
My quest to become a full-time writer, though, was delayed for decades by two key weaknesses: I like to eat food and live indoors.
So I went to law school and worked as a
lawyer for decades, which allowed me to support a family and make and save money.
Having
saved that money, now I get to write stories for young people full time. (And
still eat food and live indoors.) I’m incredibly privileged to get to do what I
always wanted.
Privilege. We’ll get back to that.
If
you’re not tied into the world of writing for young people or have been living
under a rock, you may have missed this month’s kerfuffle over writer Mac
Barnett dismissing what the rest of us do.
Barnett
was appointed the ambassador of children’s literature by the ALA in 2025, for a
two-year position he, in seriously Trumpian fashion, promptly tarnished.
In his new slim book of essays out this month, Make Believe: On Telling Stories to Children, Barnett quoted science fiction author Theodore Sturgeon’s remark that even if 90% of science fiction was crud, it was still worthwhile to write excellent science fiction, because 90% of everything is crud. Barnett went on to offer Barnett’s Addendum to Sturgeon’s Law: “Maybe more like 94.7 percent of kids’ books are crud.” (p. 19)
Ouch.
Gosh. Thank you, Mr. Ambassador.
That 94.7% quote felt like a punch in the stomach, and it took me a couple of days to mostly
recover. (Obviously, I’m not fine yet, because three freaking weeks later, I’m
blogging about it, when much of the entire rest of children’s literature has
already thoughtfully weighed in: Tracy Baptiste, Kate Messner, Christine
Soontornvat, Rob Costello, and many other authors have taken issue with Mac Barnett and his
Addendum. My favorite terse take was the “trust fall fail” cartoon by
illustrator Kaz Windness, where Barnett is a unicorn about to skewer, rather
than catch, children's book creators falling backward.)
It’s appalling, though, that he got that traction by throwing the rest of the creators of young people’s literature under the bus.
“The wheels on the bus go Splat! Moan
Wail…Splat! Moan Wail…”
In the midst of CrudGate, however, there’s a teaching moment, to talk about privilege and what we do with it.
In
discussing privilege and success, two things can both be true: (1) you can be
talented, hard-working, and resourceful, having overcome hardships and
obstacles; and (2) you can be privileged and lucky. Success often requires both
(1) and (2).
Talking
honestly about privilege is unusual, so before we get back to Mac Barnett, I’ll go first:
My name is Dean Gloster, and if my dad had been Black, I would not have the
comfortable life I enjoy.
This
is my dad, Dean Francis Gloster:
Almost
none of that would have been remotely possible if he were Black.
The University of Nevada Reno admitted fewer than one black student per year in the 1940s. Under binding lending regulations, until 1973 federally-insured housing loans were unavailable for Black families that wanted to buy in white neighborhoods, and were completely unavailable in black neighborhoods and most integrated neighborhoods, period.
It wasn’t until a 1971 consent decree that most Nevada Casinos even employed significant numbers of Black 21 dealers, let alone promoted Black workers to top management.
And
what about me? Because of my dad’s substantial income and the generational
wealth created by my parents’ home ownership (the value appreciated enormously
since 1960) my parents were able to send me to college and helped put me
through an out-of-state law school, UCLA, where I graduated first in my class.
Because of that, I clerked for two U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Anthony Kennedy
(when he was on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) and Byron White at the
Supreme Court. Then I worked for a prestigious San Francisco law firm, Farella
Braun & Martel, LLP where I became a partner.
What
would have been different for me if my father was Black? First, I wouldn’t
exist: My dad married my white mother in 1954, and I was born in 1958.
Interracial marriage wasn’t legalized in Nevada (the first state in the west to
do so) until 1959. Because of redlining, I almost certainly couldn’t have gone
to what was regarded as the good academic middle school and high school in Reno,
which had few black students. I wouldn’t have been able to afford out of state
tuition, so if I went to law school it would have been at the less prestigious University
of Nevada, with little chance for a federal clerkship and absolutely no
chance of clerking at the Supreme Court. Because they didn’t recruit from
schools like the University of Nevada, I couldn’t have gotten an interview at
the law firm where I became a partner, and I almost certainly wouldn’t have
made enough money to retire early and turn to writing when I did.
My
father and I were both hard working, career-focused, disciplined, educated, and
smart. But we were successful because we were also white. Privileged.
And that privilege, unfortunately, was never discussed in my family—nothing about redlining, anti-miscegenation statutes, color barriers in hiring. It was also never taught in any school I went to. After I became a writer, I had to look it up, doing research.
Which
brings us back to Mac Barnett. As my writer friend Mike J. noted, “Publishing
loves young white guys.”
If
you don’t think being male gives you an arbitrary advantage, I give you the
experience of Catherine Nichols. As described here, she submitted her query and
opening pages, under her name, to 50 literary agents, and got two requests for
the full manuscript. Then she submitted that same query and opening pages to 50
different literary agents under a male pseudonym. She got 17 requests for the
full manuscript. That math suggests you’re eight-and-a-half times as likely to
get a manuscript request if you’re male.
But
Mac Barnett’s privilege isn’t just being a young white guy. When he was
starting out writing for young people, he was good friends with Jon Scieszka’s
daughter. Jon Scieszka was the first ambassador for young people’s literature
and the well-regarded author of lots of wonderful books for young readers
including The Stinky Cheese Man and Other Fairly Stupid Tales and the Time
Warp Trio chapter books. Scieszka took Barnett under his wing and opened doors
for him.
I’m
especially struck by Sam & Dave Dig a Hole, which is
ground-breaking: It’s a surrealistic picture book with incredible
re-readability, and it opened my eyes to what can be done with the form. But a
huge part of its impact is Jon Klassen’s illustrations. If you or I approached
Candlewick with the text for that book, we probably wouldn’t get Jon Klassen
assigned as our illustrator. In fact, if you or I approached a publisher with
the text for that book—without the track record, reputation, and proven success
of Mac Barnett—we’d probably get “I don’t get it” instead of a publishing deal.
Which
perhaps explains Barnett’s unfortunate quote: To use a baseball analogy: if
through some special rule you got to start every inning as a runner on third
base, you too might be puzzled why the rest of us aren’t hitting more triples.
Privilege
exists. My view is that fact should make us respond by trying to be kinder,
more inclusive, and more moral: Try to acknowledge your privilege, refrain from punching
down, and if you have the chance, use your privilege to raise others up, not
push them under the bus because they haven’t achieved what you have.
I
still love writing. Sending love to you all, fellow creators, and to those who
enjoy our stories. Let’s try to do better.















Comments
Post a Comment