Should I or Shouldn’t I Break This Rule? by Allie Burton

 

Authors have rules to follow especially when you’re writing genre fiction. In Romance, it must end with a Happily Ever After or for Young Adult Romance a Happy For Now. In Historical, the period and setting must be established on the first page. In Horror, you have to start with the normal world before anything scary happens. In Fantasy, the worlds and the magic must follow its own set of rules.

Then there are other more general rules like never kill an animal (Agreed!), only have two points of view (Disagree.), never end a chapter with the character falling asleep (Mostly agree.), never start a book with a description of the weather (Unless weather becomes a character.), keep your exclamation points under control (Agreed!!!!), and so on.

Rules are made to be broken. But which rules and when?

Here’s my dilemma:

My current work in progress (WIP) is the seventh book in the series. The first part of the book takes place concurrently with the end of the sixth book in the series. Some of the scenes are the same but from a different character’s point of view and some are flashbacks, in the first chapter.

Rule Breaking Alert! Rule Breaking Alert!

Never use flashbacks in the first chapter.

Normally, I’d agree. The reader wants to be in the present. If it’s important enough for a flashback, then it’s important enough to show the action live.

Yet, I wrote two flashbacks in the first chapter to show scenes from the new main character’s viewpoint. If you read the earlier books, you’re reading the same short scenes but with the thoughts and emotions of the new main character and a twist. I struggled with breaking this rule when I wrote it, and am still debating with myself.

My concept editor didn’t like the flashbacks. She said, “I need to get centered in this character and her reality and this confused me.” She also said, “These flashbacks are great and interesting, but I think a prologue would work better.”

Rule Breaking Alert! Rule Breaking Alert!

Never have a prologue.

I don’t necessarily agree with this rule. Sometimes prologues are necessary. And I considered it in this situation. But I wanted to start with the main character’s current predicament. I wanted to start with action. I felt a prologue would slow the reader down.

So what should I do?

#rules of writing #genrefiction #genrefictionrules #yafantasy #yabooks #academyfantasy #witchacademy #fishoutofwater #allieburton #GlassSlipperAdventure #LostDaughtersofAtlantis

Comments

  1. I've broken soooo many of these. Prologues! Multiple POVs! A flashback IN a prologue! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I guess the never end a chapter with someone going to sleep wouldn't apply to zombies. I'd never heard that rule and I've broken it many times.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are prologues and there are prologues. If the prologue is both interesting/exciting to read AND necessary or at least extremely helpful to the understanding of what follows, I'd say go with it. (I've used them in a few books). Ditto flashbacks. They can be tricky to do well, but done well can really enhance a story or a character. Go with your gut!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment